baby products

80% of baby formula reportedly contains arsenic!

Sign-up to one of our many Group Actions today - use our quick and easy form to start your claim for compensation.

Begin Your Group Action Claim Today
Please note we are unable to proceed with claims involving BMW, Dacia, Ford, Honda, MINI, Mercedes-Benz & Mitsubishi.
The deadline for claims for EA189 engines passed in 2018, and claims settled in 2022. We are unable to take any claims on for vehicles with EA189 engines. We are able to take on claims for newer engine types that are NOT EA189 engines.
Our claims team will call you back at a time that's suitable to you.
Your privacy is extremely important to us.
Information on how we handle your data is in our Privacy Policy
solicitors regulation authority

80% of baby formula reportedly contains arsenic!

Scientific studies into baby food have allegedly found that a shockingly high-level of baby formulas tested contained arsenic.

To be precise, some 80%!

Arsenic poisoning is extremely serious as it can attack the blood cells and can be fatal. For a baby or an infant, the thought of them ingesting arsenic is literally horrifying. Not-for-profit organisation The Clean Label Project believes that the labelling of food and products should be completely transparent, and it was this organisation that reportedly tested a variety of baby foods, formulas, drinks and snacks for toddlers to see just what they contained.

Having reportedly tested 530 different products, the most shocking outcome was that 80% of infant formulas apparently tested positive for arsenic. In some products, results showed as much as 600 parts-per-billion of arsenic.

Several top brands allegedly tested positive for the toxic metalloid, including:

  • Enfamil
  • Gerber
  • Plum Organics
  • Sprout

Dartmouth University researchers found that there may be arsenic exposure in a lot of foods due to pesticides from the soil in the earth. According to the researchers, brown rice, some seafood, brussel sprouts, beer and wine, as well as some chicken, contain trace amounts of arsenic.

However, these are not arguably just ‘trace’ amounts; 600 parts-per-billion of arsenic is not necessarily insignificant. Regulators are reportedly aware of trace arsenic amounts in food, and there have been previous calls for limits of 100 parts-per-billion. As such, a baby product containing six-times the potential maximum level of arsenic is worrying.

The World Health Organisation explains that children ingesting high levels of arsenic can massively increase their chances of horrific conditions such as:

  • Suffering cancer
  • Skin lesions
  • Diabetes
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Underdevelopment
  • Hindered fine motor skills
  • Other neurological problems

Gerber responded to the report and dismissed the findings. They have rejected the concerns that babies and young infants may be ingesting excessive and dangerous levels of arsenic.

In a statement, Gerber’s representative said that the report, “may have caused unnecessary alarm”, about their products and assured that the company’s products, “meet or exceed standards for quality and safety”. They also added that, “we regularly test our foods and formulas”.

The report also found that some products labelled as “organic” had even more arsenic in them; around double the levels in some cases.

Other startling statistics from the report included:

  • 65% of the 530 foods tested positive for arsenic
  • 58% of the products tested positive for cadmium
  • 60% of products that claim to be BPA free tested positive for BPA

Cadmium is also a toxic metal usually found in industrial work sites. The metal is linked with kidney failure, respiratory diseases, development difficulties, cardiovascular diseases and skeletal lesions, according to experts.

It all makes for worrying reading.

The content of this post/page was considered accurate at the time of the original posting and/or at the time of any posted revision. The content of this page may, therefore, be out of date. The information contained within this page does not constitute legal advice. Any reliance you place on the information contained within this page is done so at your own risk.