eye claims

Hoya Surgical Optic Intraocular Lenses Recall

Sign-up to one of our many Group Actions today - use our quick and easy form to start your claim for compensation.

Begin Your Group Action Claim Today
Please note we are unable to proceed with claims involving BMW, Dacia, Ford, Honda, MINI, Mercedes-Benz & Mitsubishi.
The deadline for claims for EA189 engines passed in 2018, and claims settled in 2022. We are unable to take any claims on for vehicles with EA189 engines. We are able to take on claims for newer engine types that are NOT EA189 engines.
Our claims team will call you back at a time that's suitable to you.
Your privacy is extremely important to us.
Information on how we handle your data is in our Privacy Policy
solicitors regulation authority

Hoya Surgical Optic Intraocular Lenses Recall

Back in 2013, Hoya group initiated a recall when it was reported that users were having adverse effects from surgically implanted optic lenses.

These lenses are like permanent contact lenses that are fused onto the eye. It’s a medical device commonly used for patients with cataracts or myopia where the lens may have deteriorated. However, many users came forward saying they had symptoms such as:

  • Discomfort
  • Redness of the eye
  • Loss of vision


These early on symptoms, if left untreated, could lead to an acute inflammatory response which would require lengthy medical treatment. In two much more serious cases, acute bacterial endophthalmitis was reported. This condition can cause permanent loss of vision or even loss of eye entirely.

Hoya responded by voluntarily initiating a recall of these lenses:

  • NY-60
  • iSert 250
  • iSert 251

They stopped shipping these lenses and asked doctors and medical institutes to send any stock back to Hoya. The Japanese company, based in Singapore, looked into the lenses and found “trace residual foreign particles” that may or may not be the culprit in the adverse effects. According to the Royal College of Orthalmologists, the lenses may affect 0.03%-0.3% of users. However, it seems like Hoya are taking no chances as they pulled all stock for the suspected lenses.

The Medical Health Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) also produced a medical device alert for the lenses to stop them from being used on patients in the UK. Hoya additionally decided to stop shipping the Toric 311 and the iSert Toric 351 lenses too as they used a similar manufacturing process to the original three lenses being recalled. Hoya has plans to continue manufacturing the five lens types once they have received approval by regulators.

Thanks to Hoya’s willingness to act upon their findings and to voluntarily initiate a recall, many users may have been prevented from using the suspected defected lenses. However, for those that the recall came too late for, those victims may be eligible for recovering compensation from Hoya for their negligence during the manufacturing process.

Companies normally have insurance policies for this sort of thing. It’s expected the Hoya will be met by multiple claims for financial compensation from those who have already had the recalled lenses implanted in their eyes. Claimants may have already suffered symptoms and received treatment, or have had surgery to remove the lenses to prevent such symptoms. This type of systematic and potentially widespread effect of negligence may prompt a group action being brought against Hoya.

If you have been affected by this, our Group Action Lawyers can help you. Please contact us on 0800 634 75 75 for help and advice.

The content of this post/page was considered accurate at the time of the original posting and/or at the time of any posted revision. The content of this page may, therefore, be out of date. The information contained within this page does not constitute legal advice. Any reliance you place on the information contained within this page is done so at your own risk.