Sign-up to one of our many Group Actions today - use our quick and easy form to start your claim for compensation.
The worldwide company Johnson & Johnson has been on the end of some monumental compensation claims and group actions across the globe.
The year of 2016 was quite the whirlwind year for Johnson & Johnson; they reportedly lost 6 out of 7 jury verdicts in the U.S. as a result of ‘defective’ products. According to Bloomberg, this year isn’t looking any better.
As a general rule of thumb, companies wouldn’t normally face more than 2 or 3 product defect verdicts above $20 million (£15 million) in one year – Johnson & Johnson lost 6 verdicts – and each were valued at more than $50 million (£37 million).
The pharmaceutical and medical devices manufacturer was hit with:
For the vast majority of the lawsuits, Johnson & Johnson denied liability for the injuries inflicted on the victims. As mentioned above, Johnson & Johnson say there’s no scientific evidence linking the use of their talcum-based products and ovarian cancer, and in the Risperdal claims, Johnson & Johnson state that both patients and doctors were sufficiently warned about the side effects.
There are multiple group actions going on in relation to the above products. No wonder Johnson & Johnson are facing more than 100,000 claims over these products, and there aren’t any signs of it slowing down. This is shown recently as Johnson & Johnson were ordered to pay $110 million (£85 million) to Lois Slemp who says that the use of the baby powder caused her to develop ovarian cancer.
Johnson & Johnson is facing at least 17 trials in U.S. courts over hip implants, talcum powder, pelvic mesh, an anti-psychotic drug and a blood thinner this year alone. The publicity of the lawsuits only encourages more people to come forward, thus Johnson & Johnson should watch their backs as the numbers are only going to increase.
Sources:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2972564/Risperdal-producers-award-autistic-man-2-5million-damages-grew-size-46DD-breasts-effect-drug-took-boy.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-07-01/j-j-faces-record-70-million-verdict-over-male-breasts
http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-johnson-johnson-verdict-hipimplants-idUKKBN13Q5XF
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39816799
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-28/why-johnson-johnson-would-like-to-forget-2016-quicktake-q-a?cmpid=yhoo.headline
The content of this post/page was considered accurate at the time of the original posting and/or at the time of any posted revision. The content of this page may, therefore, be out of date. The information contained within this page does not constitute legal advice. Any reliance you place on the information contained within this page is done so at your own risk.